fair game changes to bill
-
Financial Flow
Regulatory approval
All deals must get formal approval by the regulator -
Financial flow
All parties involved
Deals can’t be approved just by two parties -
Financial flow
Power to impose a deal
The regulator must have power to set a deal -
financial flow
Set parameters
Regulator sets parameters that deal must meet -
Timing of report
State of Game report
The report must be frequent and regular -
Transparency
Clear fund source
Owners’ funds must be clear and transparent -
vested interest
End conflicts on decisions
Conflict of interests need to be clearly spelt out -
support for clubs
Clubs need resources
Training, staffing and financial support essential -
Owners' test
Human rights standards
Modern-day slavery and human rights included -
owners' test
State-controlled clubs
Sportswashing and competitive balance -
owners' test
Replacing bad owners
Mechanisms must be put in place -
fan engagement
Fans final say on names
On key issues fans must have the power of veto -
fan engagement
The Wimbledon clause
No club can be moved without fan approval -
Competitions
Domestic game No 1
Domestic competitions should be protected -
green & EDI
Ethical concerns matter
Environment and equality standards in report -
women's game
Women must be included
Regulator must look at how to regulate women’s game -
Multi-club owners
Advantages unclear
Regulator must review multi-club ownership -
Player welfare
Impact on players
Review needed on fixture congestion on players